On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:46 AM, DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > If I saw systemd-filesystem installed, then I would think that > > something needs to be placed into the systemd folder structure, > > Perhaps the bug is this: that you need to install a whole other RPM > just to make a directory exist so you can put a file in it. > > Why can't the RPM providing the file just make the directory and not > have a dependency at all? > As long your package doesn't need the package providing the directory for normal functionality, there's no reason not to have your package own that directory[1]. Packages that provide unit files, but are otherwise useful in the absence of systemd would probably fall into this category. Rich [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
