On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:01:16 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:11:50 +0200 > > Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > > > > > What is the recommended way to contact the Ocaml maintainers? > > > > > > There is a systematic packaging bug which introduces unusable i686 > > > packages into the x86_64 compose, and despite repeated messages to > > > ocaml-devel, I did not receive a response: > > > > > > <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ocaml-devel/2014-July/002265.html> > > This list is dead AFAIK. I certainly haven't read it in many years, > and we've been trying to delete it (without success, it seems). > > > hm, Richard (rwmjones) is usually very responsive ... > > > > I think the solution for the i686 ocaml devel files is to update the > > multilib policy in mash to exclude ocaml-* completely > > As Dan says, multilib is inappropriate for OCaml. There's never any > reason why you would want to use 32 bit OCaml packages if you have a > 64 bit machine. So simply blocking i686 on x86-64 is the way to go. > > There is even a bug about it, but I cannot find it in BZ right now. patch for mash sent as https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2014-August/004357.html Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
