Am 22.08.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Dusty Mabe: > I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me > understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs? > > At least in the past I think circular dependencies have been kept to a minimum > as it can cause issues with rpm sorting: i.e. for two rpms A,B with a circular > dependency, in different transactions sometimes A goes before B and sometimes > B goes before A. > > In Fedora 20 just running rpm against the 1500 or so packages I have installed > on my Desktop I notice that there are 47 sets of "Strongly Connected > Components"; > basically 47 cases of a circular dependency. > > Was there a point where this became more popular. I don't remember there > being more > than a few circular deps for EL6 era rpms.
how should it work otherwise? * each package defines it's depndencies * each of the dependencies have their own * no package knows the whole picture * each package has to pull all deps it needs if * A requires B * B requires C it's clear that removal of C would also remove A because it removes B caused by the deps leading to remove A if you can remove C the B has a package error which is in theory possible because C already could have been installed and nobody noticed the missing dep until you remove it and nothing complais (been there)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
