<snip>
> >
> > Could you give me a list of packages with problems so I can do the
> second part?
> So the packages in question are: rubygem-actionmailer, rubygem-actionpack,
> rubygem-activerecord, rubygem-activeresource, rubygem-activesupport,
> rubygem-rails, rubygem-rack and rubygems. These are relevant bugzillas:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115776
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095129
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095127
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095125
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095122
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095120
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095118
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961066
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948706
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924318
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924297
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905374
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905373
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891468
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847202
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843924
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831583
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731453
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731451
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731450
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677629
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097205
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909088
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814725
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771152
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771151
>
> Looks scary, but it the end it`s just rails, rubygems and rack. All of
> these are co-maintained with Michael Stahnke, which I have no luck
> contacting either. There are actually more unfixed vulnerabilities, but I
> am confident they can be fixed by more active maintainers.
>



Hey, sorry for not getting some of these updated (you also didn't stay on
#fedora-ruby long enough for me to respond). I find that updating many of
these breaks API, because ruby library authors are really good at fixing
security problems while introducing new issues. Many of them I didn't think
I could update in EPEL -- for example moving rails from 2.x to 3.x is a
HUGE change.

Rubygems got rolled into ruby upstream - so the old rubygems isn't
maintained upstream.

Rack I should fix - they are good at compatibility.


I also welcome any co-maintainers on these items. I used to use these
packages lots from EPEL, at my current workplace I don't really.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to