Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams: > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> said: >> On Wed, 09.07.14 10:30, Miloslav Trmač (m...@redhat.com) wrote: >>> * breaks the configurable [UG]ID_MIN logic >>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/1000SystemAccounts, and yes, >>> that is actually used and needed) >> >> Well, this is something I really don't like. THis limit should be >> compile-time configurable, but not runtime-configurable. This is >> something the distributor needs to decide on, not something >> administrators should be able to change without recompiling.
and because someone decicdes to compile different the admin should be forced to re-compile? that's not how the world works! > Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network > environment, having differing versions of UID_MIN (where recompilation > is required to change) is just wrong. As the message above sys, "yes, > that is actually used and needed". I see no valid justification for > removing that functionality +1 UID_MIN 500 UID_MAX 60000 GID_MIN 500 GID_MAX 60000 still here in use and that won't change if somebody enforces to change that at compile time he don't care for any production setups not re-installed every year and decides to break things just for fun
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
