On 20.06.2014 15:44, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:19:55 +0200
poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote:
f20:
*filelists.sqlite.bz2 3.5 M
*filelists.xml.gz 3.3 M
*primary.sqlite.bz2 2.7 M
*primary.xml.gz 1.3 M
*other.sqlite.bz2 1.3 M
*other.xml.gz 964 K
*Fedora-20-comps.xml 906 K
*Fedora-20-comps.xml.gz 210 K
repomd.xml 3.6 K
rawhide:
*filelists.xml.gz 28 M <- xz?
*filelists.sqlite.xz 25 M
*primary.sqlite.xz 17 M
*primary.xml.gz 10 M <- xz?
*other.sqlite.xz 7.5 M
*other.xml.gz 5.8 M <- xz?
*prestodelta.xml.xz 2.9 M
*comps-rawhide.xml 1.6 M <- ?
*comps-rawhide.xml.xz 230 K
repomd.xml 4.2 K <- xz?
Why aren't all compressed with the xz, in rawhide?
Why two *comps* with the same original checksums?
because thats how createrepo works. the gzipped files are not ones you
download. yum and dnf use the sqlite files.
Dennis
"because thats how createrepo works"!? :)
I'm talking in general, why not use the same improved compression for all!
I haven't mentioned an interactive, rpm based, package managers, at all. :)
But when you mention them, it is obvious that we need features and performance
of the delta repodata, which is currently lacking.
Rather than listen to a dandified hullabaloo. :)
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
