Le vendredi 13 juin 2014 à 15:07 +0200, Petr Spacek a écrit : > On 13.6.2014 14:58, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 13.06.2014 14:53, schrieb Jan Zelený: > >> That being said, the reason for not renaming dnf to yum is that renaming > >> this > >> project to yum will do nothing else than to confuse its users, as they will > >> think this is still yum and they should expect from dnf it what they > >> expected > >> from yum. They should not. And dnf is not yum, I'm really sorry if you > >> think > >> it is. > > > > the user expects that anyways if you replace something he > > did not asked for replace it and what just worked for him > > > > why do so many developers not understand that simple fact? > > I don't think that simple fact that DNF is re-write of YUM justifies > re-naming > and re-training all users. Users don't care what you do with the source. And > of course, users will complain no matter what you do.
Like they complained when up2date was replaced by yum ? when zipper replaced whatever they used to have on *suse before ? When pkgin replaced pkg_add on some of the BSD ? It happened in the past, and I do not remember seeing so much complains.. -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
