On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when > > speaking the truth. > > There was no negative tone in Matthew Garrett's original message: > > If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86, > > then we should just drop them back to secondary status. > > There was nothing impolite or insulting in there. It might be impopular with > the ARM people, but it's still a valid point that had to be made, and > shouldn't have been retracted.
In context, there was absolutely an impolite tone - it confounded there being no interest in making a single package work on ARM with the Fedora ARM community having no interest in feature parity. These are not actually the same thing, and the fact that I equated them was inappropriate. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
