2014-06-12 17:03 GMT+02:00 Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>
>>
>> We are on the same page, thanks for your input.
>>
>
> I don't think so. You are clearly arguing for a temporary compatibility
> wrapper but eventually forcing everyone to use dnf as the command. The
> other side is wanting yum to continue to remain the name for the command
> with yum-legacy for temporary transition. In otherwords, dnf is an
> internal project name and doesn't need to be exposed to the user.
>
There are not only two sides :) I don’t insist on dnf being a hidden
“internal project name”; introducing new features (only?) under the dnf
name is fine with me. I do object to planning to unnecessarily break the
yum commands for which we actually have compatibility.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
