On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers: > >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of > >>> funny. > >> > >> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB > >> allowed it. > > > you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did > > not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in > > your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer > > to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed > > FHS update and from where it comes > > It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions. > /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates > needless and nothing but annoying differences.
It's a practical way to keep helpers out of path and autocomplete without polluting /usr/lib[64] and having to deal with multilib issues, what's pointless about it ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
