Hi, That's my recollection as well. Heard that confusion about sbin being for superuser before.
Jon On 5 May 2014 15:29, "Adam Jackson" <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser > > binaries which should not be overriden because a binary > > with the same name exists in /usr/bin > > My memory is that the "s" was more for "static" not "superuser". > There's some conceptual overlap, static binaries being there to recover > even if your shared libraries are hosed which is normally a "superuser" > kind of operation, but. > > - ajax > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
