On 04/30/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. >> anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so >> that systemd gets installed first, and the packages that ship service >> files get installed later. Without the deps, rpm wouldn't know the order >> in which it has to run the transaction. >> >> For example, when a package bar has a postinstall script that does: >> >> systemctl enable bar.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || : >> >> ... but if systemctl gets installed _after_ foo in the same transaction, >> then the systemctl command never runs and service stays disabled. > If you are right, this is an argument for rpm collections, which we've > had for ages now and should really start using. > > - ajax > Created a ticket.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/425 Next I will create a change request if the ticket is approved. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
