On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 09:47 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > The votes are equal (48% vs. 52%) so I forwarded it to Env&Stack WG, which is > probably more appropriate than FeSCo.
We discussed the issue on today's Env and Stacks WG meeting [1] and agreed on the following: "The Env and Stacks WG's suggestion to the dnf-plugins-core maintainers is to create a separate dnf-plugin-copr package with the dnf-plugin-playground subpackage. In addition, we suggest to defer moving copr.py out of the dnf-plugin-core upstream git repository until DNF's API stabilizes (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)" Regards, Tadej [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-29/env-and-stacks.2014-04-29-12.04.log.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
