Hi, > On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 10:08 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> but the container itself runs in a network namespace, so it gets its own >>> loopback device. This will mean 127.0.0.1:53 points to the container itself, >>> not the host, so dns resolving in the container will not work.
Ah, interesting! Thank you so much for sharing these details. > OTOH, it would be straightforward to write a tiny stub that forwards > 127.0.0.1:53 to something outside the container. I think this is a better option than having a different device address like 127.0.0.53. Forwarding traffic from inside namespace to a loop-back device on the host is analogous to a guest(VM) forwarding traffic to its host via bridge interface. Thank you. --- Regards -Prasad http://feedmug.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
