Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Is the intent to only provide SCL versions of the older ruby & rails, or
> also the current versions (i.e., move to SCL as the rails delivery
> mechanism going forward)?

(Assuming we really want to support SCLs at all,) the default version should 
most definitely NOT be an SCL, but an FHS-compliant non-SCL package in /usr. 
SCLs are only a hack to provide non-default versions, not suitable as a 
replacement for normal distribution packages.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to