Picking this up late but am I current in understanding this essentially creates an additional kernel level sandbox to the ssh secure tty tunnelling? and is this for both server and client or just for server env./?
Corey W Sheldon Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine 310.909.7672 www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jrez...@redhat.com>wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > = Proposed System Wide Change: The securetty file is empty by default = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default > > > > Change owner(s): quickbooks <quickbooks.off...@gmail.com> > > > > The securetty file is empty by default > > > > There's on-going discussion for this Change on the devel list. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197344.html > > Fedora Base Working Group discussed this Change on today's meeting > (2014-04-11) and tends to support counter proposal to remove securetty > entirely from the default PAM configuration (not from distribution) > as discussed in the thread mentioned above. Base WG would like to ask > FESCo to weight it as part of decision making (once this change hits > FESCo meeting). > > Jaroslav > on behalf of Base WG > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
