how stable is the x86 4.9 prerelease? when building I mean
Corey W Sheldon Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine 310.909.7672 www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:15 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > > <johan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 04/10/2014 02:06 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease, > >>>> please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your > >>>> package no longer builds. To investigate runtime rather than compile > >>>> time > >>>> issues, please consider using temporarily -fsanitize=undefined and/or > >>>> -fsanitize=address to look for undefined behavior in the packages > >>>> you own. > >>> > >>> Hm. So the kernel I tried to build this morning failed on ARM: > >>> > >>> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=6723963&name=build.log > >>> > >>> That cross-built locally (gcc 4.8.1) here fine before I sent it to > >>> koji. Anyone have any ideas on that? > >> > >> Could be this [1] > >> > >> JBG > >> > >> 1. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663 > > > > Indeed. I just found that myself. Thanks. > > On the bright side, a scratch build with just i686 and x86_64 does build > fine: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6724931 > > So the issue seems isolated to ARM. At least in terms of building. > Haven't tested functionality yet. > > josh > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
