On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabe...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> fsadm failed: 3 > > man fsadm > > DIAGNOSTICS > On successful completion, the status code is 0. A status code of 2 > indicates the operation was interrupted by the user. A > status code of 3 indicates the requested check operation could not be > performed because the filesystem is mounted and does > not support an online fsck(8). A status code of 1 is used for other > failures. Yeah but did fsadm fail? No, as a whole its operation succeeded. Can we say fsadm failed to run fsck? I guess that's one way to look at it, but then it failed to understand it shouldn't request a check operation on XFS in the first place. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
