On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:35 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> Just to mention: there are probably many packages where the equivalent >> of %check can't be run without access to a source tree, so Taskotron >> can't usefully replace %check. I maintain a package like that. > > How do you get from that premise to that conclusion? We know where the > source tree is...
I don't think this would be a good idea to avoid such tests in %check. If you do that you have to later fetch the source code again, build it again and finally you can run the tests. Dridi > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
