2014-02-04 Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can > continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be > secondary to our primary deliverables". [snip]
Yes, in my eyes that's the reason why spins should not become a separate product. They can/should be part of a product, such as Workstation, and maybe only Security is worth a discussion apart. How we will call the spins in fedora.ext is not important, but we should have a clear idea soon about them. Personally I wouldn't either keep any of them as release blocking (except GNOME probably), only products should be able to block a release. Just my personal thought about this topic ;) Cheers. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
