On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to the > latter, I think it's a mistake to have a primary application installation > tool that only deals with GUI apps, because it relegates text-based tools, > such as 'units', to a second-class status of being hard to find and to > install.
That's not the tool we've designed and built. We've built a GUI application installer, not a package installer. > Similarly, at least some apps with inactive upstream are fine the > way they are and do not deserve to be locked up in the attic. Right, that's fine. The Fedora packager can create one in 2 minutes (yes!) and ship it in the package. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
