Am 27.01.2014 00:57, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > I don't think this subthread is being particularly useful... > > And the personal attacks are undesirable. > Please stop or at least take it to private email
*sorry* for not early enough realize trolling in first start with the same argumentation as Simon and me to later fight against it while now claim i came up with the idea of snapshots while warning all the time and tried to explain Chris *why* i warn -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350 Datum: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:42:13 -0700 Von: Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> Antwort an: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> An: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> I don't follow this. The realization an update is bad doesn't necessarily occur right away. So we still need a way to separate system domain vs user domain, at least, so that system files are rolled back separately from user files _______________________________________________________ can someone *please stop that troll telling lies* > And then you propose a ridonkulous snapshot-rollback strategy that would for > certain cause > major problems if the rollback were actually done, and then use that as fait > accompli for > why the entire concept of fs rollbacks are stupid. Your arguments are > asinine. Your emails > belong in a kill file.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
