On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 00:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > "catastrophic Fedora 20 regression" > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 > "rpm scriptlets are exiting with status 127" > "EVERYONE" > "IMPOSSIBLE" to fix this using GUI tools installed by default. The > "some stupid reason (because somebody decided to make it as painful as > possible to disable that > SELinux junk?" > "dreaded thing" > "(or even operating system)!" > "BRICKED." > "The ONLY thing that tool is designed to do at all is PREVENT things. It does > not have a SINGLE feature" > (read: single point of failure!) > (scalability disaster!) > duplication of all logic!) > (Note the 3 (!) major antipatterns in a single-sentence (!) description of > how SELinux works!) > BREAKS > draconian Update Policies > vain attempt > utterly failed > default! Just consider the benefits (none!) > If we want to have any users left, SELinux needs to go away NOW! > The Update Policies must be repealed > totally failed
> Why would we stick our heads in the sand this time? > > DISABLE/DROP SELINUX NOW! That's a great way to go about having a calm and reasoned discussion and building consensus, Kevin. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
