Yes, sorry, forget what I wrote. I messed up mock with yum, that's why. It's too late for me to chime in here. Sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>wrote: > > > Am 13.01.2014 00:43, schrieb Alec Leamas: > > First of all, this is not, and have never been a question of disabled > repos. Or should not have. "yum clean all" > > refers to cleaning all metadata, not all repos. It only operates on one > single repo, be it implicit (the default > > link) or an explicit -r option. > > > > This is what confuses. I know: been there done that... Even though the > documents are clear, the behaviour does > > indeed cause confusion for some reason even though it's well-defined. > > > > Of course, changing semantics for yum is a bad idea, agreed. I did not > have anything like that in mind. At most, > > some info on what buildroot which is used in the output, or similar > measures. > > > > For dnf, I guess one could possibly think somewhat more free. > Personally, I tend to think that it's the implicit > > buildroot which causes much of this trouble. > > > > What happens if we get rid of the implcit buildroot, forcing us to > specify it every time? With 'default' as a legal > > option? Personally, I tend to think this might make things a little > clearer. > > *what* is a "buildroot" in case of YUM/DNF? > > in any case nothing relevant for a user and said that i use Fedora and YUM > for > many years, the only conetxt of "buildroot" for me is rpmbuild and that > has no > context to YUM/DNF at all > > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
