Thanks Adam, that was the reference I was looking for. Cheers, Tim
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Williamson" <awill...@redhat.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:39:41 PM > Subject: Re: libev - bundling - "expected" > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 13:09 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote: > > Greetings folks - > > > > It appears that I've run into a conundrum: libev upstream developer(s) > > actually encourage (re)bundling of libev, see - > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049554 > > > > I was wondering if there was president for how to handle *this. In > > groking the code, it's not run-time configurable, but alas it's a > > dependency on one of my packages. > > The bundling policy has an exception for 'copylibs', which *may* apply > here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Copylibs > > this is the clause you would need to check to see if your case matches > it. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Cheers, Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
