Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:36:11 -0800 Subject: Re: dnf versus yum From: richard.vicker...@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:28 PM, yersinia <yersinia.spi...@gmail.com> wrote: >5 PM, poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as >> opposed to being some >> nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf >> means is "did not finish". > > Did Not Finish > Do Not Forget > Does Not Follow > Data Not Found > Did Not Find > Does Not Function > Do Not Freeze > Do Not Fix > Do Not Fax > Do Not Forward > > > poma I do not think it is nice to speak so bad about a project. The objective are clear,if something can be improved everyone can or must contribute.The criticisms are useless.We are talking about open source software, do not forget. 👍I agree Best regards > On the contrary: speaking negatively about a project may be fine so long as the context is clearly about such project, as it is only the project that is being harshly criticised. Where a problem often occurs is when such criticism crosses over into affecting an individual. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
