On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com>wrote:
> Time for another PSA... > > It appears libevdev 0.6 breaks the library's ABI without bumping the > soname (and without an announcement here or anywhere else I can find, > but an ABI change without an soname bump is just flat out wrong whether > announced or not). 0.6 was sent to Rawhide, F19 and F20 simultaneously. > I've been maintaining abi-compliance-checker in Fedora for some time now. Is there a good way to integrate it into the build system so that it would run a diff with the previously released package to check for breakages? It could be treated as informative, not necessarily a failure. It produces a fairly easy to read html report. I already use it manually to check for abi breakages in packages where upstream doesn't maintain good API/ABI versioning. I maintain pkgdiff as well and it's pretty cool but only checks diffs between packages and can do it just using the debuginfo package of the two releases. Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct