> On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > blockerbugs/models/update.py, line 55 > > <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/1/?file=1607#file1607line55> > > > > Why is this sort order change an improvement? If an older update is > > pending while a newer update is stable, we'd want to show the newer update > > Martin Krizek wrote: > But wouldn't the older update be marked as obsolete? > > Tim Flink wrote: > It should be but for example, if you look at the tracking app right now, > there are 2 anaconda/blivet updates - one of which has been deleted in bodhi > but still shows up. > > This issue was supposed to be fixed but obviously, it's not. Filed as > https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T27 > > I think that the problem of phantom updates are the root cause of the > problem as reported, but I'll ask in bug to be sure.
After re-reading the bug, I stand corrected. That was a completely different issue than I was thinking about in my head. I don't like sorting on string fields by default but I also don't see much of a way around it unless we changed the schema to use status enums instead of strings. Go ahead and push to develop. We might want to look into changing the update status field to an enum but that's well outside the scope of this fix. - Tim ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/#review118 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for blockerbugs. > > > Bugs: 438 > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/438 > > > Repository: blockerbugs > > > Description > ------- > > commit 911781af9cc06e27c0a8580f07f7673c90e7329d > Author: Martin Krizek <mkri...@redhat.com> > Date: Tue Dec 10 16:28:52 2013 +0100 > > Sort updates by (status.desc(), pending.desc()) > > This way an update label is correctly set when multiple updates fix a > bug. The label is chosen by the following order (the lowest one): > > pending testing < testing < pending stable < stable > > Fixes: #438 > > Note: the rest of the issues with displaying label is handled outside this > ticket in https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T21 > > > Diffs > ----- > > blockerbugs/models/update.py 89c083da5c91558d4dead118c67e4a1138b8cae1 > blockerbugs/controllers/main.py 1795ed1d717bb85e0f3d9e7e7008d68c2aae36d8 > blockerbugs/__init__.py dcf6c5aadb24e6d86e95d5bb3d608b81721de47f > > Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Sorting seems to be working as expected. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Krizek > >
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
