On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:43 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote: > Sorry to disagree, but segregation is standard practice and is far better > then polluting /usr/include.
I actually agree with that. Upstream libev doesn't, though. And with our current package in Fedora, we are creating a situation where developers of software using libev have to juggle weirdly to support Fedora because it's different from upstream libev and other distros. > Also, I have a package which has separate patches which I'm uncertain if > upstream has adopted. > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/libev-4.15.patch That seems off-topic for this discussion, you should send that upstream instead. -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
