Hi
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm still slightly out of sync with the fedora.next stuff (REALLY picked > a bad time to go on vacation), but it does seem to me that a decent > amount of 'mature reflection' was done on it before it was approved, at > least. > I don't really have a problem in believing that but it would be useful to know in more detail how the initial proposals came to be (who were involved? what problems are we trying to solve? what are failures of the current model? did it go through Red Hat management internally before being proposed and is more headcount being allotted? Was Fedora Board and FESCo members aware that a proposal were coming through and what was their rationale for choosing to go forward? etc) Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
