On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> 
> Fedora 20 default BTRFS guided install to qcow2 on XFS, install time 17m21s. 
> Firstboot systemd-analyze:
> 874ms (kernel) + 1.558s (initrd) + 12.866s (userspace) = 15.300s

From above, two changes: 1. Use virt-manager to create the qcow2 file; 2. The 
source ISO is moved to a separate drive, rather than on the same drive as the 
qcow2 file.

Fedora 20 default BTRFS guided install, to qcow2 (vmm default) on XFS, virtio, 
unsafe cache
Install time: 16m44s

So whatever options virt-manager is using to create qcow2 files, is either the 
same as -o preallocation=metadata,compat=1.1,lazy_refcounts=on, or any 
difference in options isn't making a difference in performance. The 37 second 
performance difference is probably due to less disk contention from the source 
ISO being on a separate drive this time around. And if I'm right about all of 
that, then the overwhelming gain is coming from unsafe cache.


Chris Murphy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to