On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > This has the downside that it'll add the dependency on gnupg, > which is not great. Maybe simply create a keyrings-filesystem > package with this directory and have whoever installs keyrings > depend on it.
If gnupg owns the directory, but your package doesn't need gnupg to function, your packages are permitted to co-own the directory with gnupg: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function A -filesystem package is a little cleaner, so it'd be nice to pursue that option if the gnupg maintainers are amenable. But, there's no need to block on either them or FPC to get this done since directory co-ownership is explicitly permitted in this instance. -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
