On 15 August 2013 15:48, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> Oh, and to clarify - upgrades were supported even before then, but > required booting Anaconda from new install media. That's been true since > the Red Hat Linux days, so years before Fedora even existed. > > I believe we are arguing over words which have different meanings depending on what each person is talking about. Does supported mean: a) We guarantee that upgrade works always and without problems? b) We guarantee that upgrade code works but may encounter problems if you have done stuff other than a default install/stuff. c) We guarantee that the upgrade code is there, and it should work but you should know what you are doing d) There is some code, we worked on it, you can activate it, but that is all we can say. Each of those has been said of upgrade by various developers over the years (Jeremy Katz would try to get it down to D but Gafton would want it to be b) and every new person on anaconda would say they wanted to get to a someday.) > -- > Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
