----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/#review65 -----------------------------------------------------------
The problem here is how to deploy this in production - there is a python-flask-assets package but it is at 0.7 instead of upstream's 0.8 and there does not appear to be an el6 build either way (branch exists but it's empty). Once the dep is figured out and the spec updated, we can talk about getting this code in but right now it can't be deployed to production - Tim Flink On Aug. 12, 2013, 2:46 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 2:46 p.m.) > > > Review request for blockerbugs. > > > Bugs: 357 > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/357 > > > Repository: blockerbugs > > > Description > ------- > > commit d86f88d7f9da899ffef44ad617a8a831327b7d80 > Author: Martin Krizek <mkri...@redhat.com> > Date: Mon Aug 12 16:40:16 2013 +0200 > > Improve asset management > > Fixes: #357 > > > I have not minified two js files in milestone_stats.html template as I am not > sure it's worth it, any objections? > > > Diffs > ----- > > requirements.txt 09e0318bc189512f5d324bda8879ad74c4763f95 > blockerbugs/templates/layout.html 49cdbd70ef8347965dfca93971449688f9cd6cb0 > blockerbugs/__init__.py bd9973579e80fc859f3e8d22c35753fbd024c5f0 > > Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Loaded pages, seems like css and js work as expected after being minified. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Krizek > >
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel