On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:11:21 +0200
Than Ngo <t...@redhat.com> wrote:

> we have now arm in F20 and it seems latex2html is broken on arm in
> F20. It's why it's built fine in F19 for you but not in f20.

latex2html builds OK on the secondary arm koji
(http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3697), so
it will be different problem

> why is arm plattform used by default to build noarch packages in F20?

it's not default, koji just selects one builder and there are 3 times
more arm builders than for i686 or x86_64 (48 for arm, 30 shared
between i686 and x86_64), so the chances for selecting arm one are much
higher


                Dan
 
> Than
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 5 August 2013 12:14, Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com[1]>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was
> stuck for 15 hours and then killed by Koji:
> 
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742[2]/[3]
> 
> 
> Would like to point out that previous Fedora 20 build from April was
> successful:
> 
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=413039[4]
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> --Simone
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
> sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
> 
> 
> http://xkcd.com/229/[5]
> http://negativo17.org/[3]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> [1] mailto:negativ...@gmail.com
> [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742
> [3] http://negativo17.org/
> [4] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=413039
> [5] http://xkcd.com/229/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to