On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:32:55 +0200 Jiri Popelka <jpope...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've been seeing [1] for couple of recent updates but have no idea > what's wrong. > I already added arch specific requirements, but that's not sufficient. > I tend to think it's false positive because nobody reported any real > problems with updates so far. > Can anybody show me what am I missing ? Thanks. Unfortunately, you're hitting a limitation in the depcheck test. What's going on is that only the x86_64 builds are being checked when both the x86_64 and i686 builds are "installed". Since the older i686 build of libsane-hpaio can't coexist with the newer x86_64 build and isn't being updated, yum correctly (given the test setup) detects a dependency issue and depcheck fails the update. With the current depcheck and the current dependencies among the hplip builds, I don't have a good solution to fix the problem. depcheck works well in most situations, this is just one of the corner cases that it trips over. Eventually, we want to replace depcheck with something better but I don't even have a guess as to when that will happen :( For future reference, you're likely to get a faster response by sending test failure questions to qa-devel@ instead of devel@. I happened to see this email quickly but we're not usually watching devel@ as closely as qa-devel@ or test@. Tim > -- > Jiri > > [1] > http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/620415-autotest/virt06.qa/depcheck/results/hplip-3.13.7-1.fc19.html > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
