On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Far better to encourage people to explicitly use /usr/bin/python2 and
> /usr/bin/python3 explicitly and discourage any use of plain /usr/bin/python,
> but definitely not change the semantics of the latter.
Right, treating the existence of /usr/bin/python as a
mistake/historical accident is reasonable.
(As a philosophical aside, isn't it rather sad that we don't have any
established conventions for handling such transition/compatibility
issues? We are treating project and every every case as unique, when
they really aren't; just about any API provider faces the same
versioning/compatibility issues sooner or later. If only there were
some kind of consensus for "how things are done" that any project
could adopt - and were expected to adopt - already in the early stages
of the project when nobody thinks a migration will ever be needed.)
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
