On Jul 19, 2013 2:16 PM, "Bill Nottingham" <nott...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Billy Crook <billycr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please voice yourself at meetings in #fedora-devel if this is important to > > > you. > > > > (Speaking purely for myself and not for other FESCo members,) I do > > want to hear from Fedora contributors - but I'd much rather hear on > > the mailing list (where messages arrive over the course of a week or > > more) rather than during the FESCo meeting (when we have only a few > > minutes to agree on a decision, and already frequently have two or > > three parallel subconversations). > > I agree with this statement. > > In terms of this feature as presented, I'm not seeing why having $MTA in the > minimal install where you need the installer to have a required configury > step for it is a proper use of everyone's time that's installing it. > Enterprise administrators are almost certainly pushing out their own > configurations directly via puppet/chef/ansible/etc. Desktop users are > primarily doing it as part of their MUA setup, or just using webmail. > > It's not as if the default MTA configuration, as I understand it (no smart > host, attempt to send all mail directly with the FQDN) is generally useful > OOTB.
It is to me, and I suspect I am not alone.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
