On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johan...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 06:12 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
>> Progress does not that frequently depend on removing older
>> functionality. Specifically in this case, removing rsyslog does not
>> make journal in any way better.
>>
>>
>>
> Perhaps not that' s a matter of opinion but to we should be able to
> compare it against the discussion and decision that was made when it was
> declared that rsyslog should become our syslogger over for example
> syslog-ng to see if it at least meats those standards.
>
This is *not the same thing*. In case anyone here is unaware, rsyslog and
syslog-ng are exclusive. ${Syslog} and systemd are not.
> In anycase the fact cannot be ignored or denied that it is unnecessary to
> ship two sysloggers...
I haven't seen anyone asking to ship two sysloggers.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
