On Seg, 2013-07-15 at 14:17 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2013-07-15 at 12:11 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > So, with this change, you don't have to remove sendmail > first. That's not a > > huge benefit, but there you go. :) > > > In others words , NONE ! > > Not true. Sendmail by default isn't something that is useful for > Fedora users in general and those who need a MTA can install it > later.
Is useful to deliver mails send by cronjobs , as discussed in others emails of this thread and or we have a good replace for cronjobs , logwatch etc , or I not agree with remove sendmail of defaults. > Less resource usage, less disk space wasted (yes, this does matter for > various users still including but not limited to cloud and minimal > servers) Like many others things , I don't think is a valid argument. > and users wouldn't have to deal with long term sendmail issues like > severe bootup delay to a minor network misconfiguration > As you state when we have network misconfiguration , so at least is useful to detect this problem ;-) Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
