On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:21:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > Is the compressed image still seekable?  If yes, that constrains the
>> > window/block size and limits the gains from switching compressors.
>> Dan's answer covered one aspect of this: are qcow2 compressed
>> images seekable, answer: yes, of course!
>> But there's another answer for xz images.  Are these seekable?
>> Yes.  Surprisingly.  I've written the code for it:
>> https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/xz-plugin-for-nbdkit/#content
>> *However* you have to prepare the xz images correctly for this to
>> happen (using the --block-size argument, see blog posting above).
>> Images created using standard xz parameters won't be seekable.  I
>> suggest it's a good idea that we do that for the cloud images, since
>> the penalty is only about 1% and it makes them a lot more useful if
>> you can use them without uncompressing them.
>
> Interesting. This would probably be a RFE against appliance-tools (and in
> the future ImageFactory), for producing raw.xz images in that way.
>
> Or, bigger picture, maybe a future qcow2 format could support this natively?

Confused. Support what? Your comment above indicates that compressed
qcow2 images are seekable already.

...Juerg

>
> --
> Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to