On 07/11/2013 12:37 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, as I said (and you cut out)
...
I do know what some people want ARM to be in terms of dense
hypserscale servers (32/64-bit)... but the community that would be using
Fedora ARM does seem to be targeting a wider array than that.
...
The F19 ARM release released 5 desktop images. You seem to be arguing that
the required featureset of ARM as a primary arch should only be for headless
deployment, but the ARM community itself is saying otherwise.
Interests differ between participants. If this was the only objection
to moving ARM to the primary build system I would say let's drop
graphics from official Fedora ARM support for the purposes of the move
and make all graphical images respins or remixes.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
