On 07/09/2013 08:00 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Jonathan Masters <j...@redhat.com
<mailto:j...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> We'll be looking into LLVM in due course. There are a few of us
capable of fixing the issue (that you were noted as being extremely
concerned about on IRC at the time - we will be happy to send you
updates on this) but we balance this with other priorities (as well as
a desire not to grow a dependency on LLVM more broadly - Fedora relies
heavily upon the expertise of RH's tools team, which focuses on GCC
almost exclusively precisely to avoid fragmenting the resources that
do exist to develop awesome new tooling). Right now, many desktops
work just fine, and there is no reason ARM cannot be a a Primary
Architecture because of a temporary bug in llvmpipe (or otherwise we
can revive this thread for you next time it breaks on the other
architecture and see if it should be demoted accordingly?). If there
is a rule saying "PA needs GNOME" then this can easily be adjusted to
reflect the fact that many are running Fedora on ARM today happily
with a variety of other desktop environments.
>
It is not only that one desktop does not work but pretty much
everything that uses GL ... Which is not acceptable in 2013 IMO ...
And this has nothing to do with GCC vs llvm either ...
Since when do we make the requirement that PA have to run any DE et all
period regardless if it's 2013 or not?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
