On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten <p...@luyten.fr> wrote: > >> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like > >> "freeze tag changes until desc is better". > >> > >> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1 karma, and > >> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good reminder like > >> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have made less > >> mistakes > >> > >> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal would not save > >> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt > > > > > > There is already a perfect example of this. > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19 > > This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma. > If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to > give it negative karma. > If it doesn't fix the bugs, the update should fix, it is appropriate to give negative karma. Otherwise the bugs would be closed, when it becomes stable, but won't be fixed.
Johannes > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
