Dne 23.5.2013 16:29, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com <mailto:vondr...@redhat.com>> wrote:*It is not possible to convert the packages technically nor philosophically* You might think million times that the sentence is not truth, but that is as it is. I'll give you several examples: * Gems cannot express dependencies on system libraries such sqlite3, libxml2, etc.Doesn't matter for the system administrator who has already installed the gem.* Gems does not undergoing legal review, i.e. you have to trust to the author of the gem, that the license is correct, which sadly may not true.Doesn't matter for the system administrator who has already installed the gem.* Bundling, quite common phenomenon.Doesn't matter for the system administrator who has already installed the gem.Just this short list of issues should be enough. It might work for you, when you decide to neglect all the issue mentioned above and probably several else, but it does not work for distribution. Sorry.I don't think this is necessarily targeted at changing how _Fedora_ distributes things; just giving system administrators a single command that works on an installed system might be an useful improvement.Mirek
Ok, so speaking for gem2rpm, it might be made more dumber to include automatically * and if no license is found, then put there "foo" for example. Actually, everybody is free to do such a template for himself, or even submit such patch upstream, but then the RPM kind of loosing its purpose.
Vít
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
