> Am 17.05.2013 12:35, schrieb Ondrej Vasik: > >> In that case, glibc maintainers need to re-consider their claim that it > >> is only material for developers & put it in glibc-common or a glibc-docs > >> package instead of the -devel package > > > > That's what the glibc maintainers proposed as longer term solution for > > their upstream todo list - split their info doc into strictly devel part > > and "general purpose" part. This may need some time, though (and even > > then, it will probably need some adoption, as it will probably be named > > differently, so links may break again)... > > > > Require glibc-devel in coreutils means + ~1M to default minimal > > installation size. Not much, but not good practice, I agree. I may go with > > coreutils-infodoc (or something like that) subpackage (keeping just basic > > manuals in main package and additional docs separately). This will bring > > back the "granularity" instead of hard dependency in the minimal install > > package. Any thoughts? > > no, it pulls "glibc-headers" and "kernel-headers" too > which are in summary 5.9 MB and around 120 MB on our > virtual infrastructure
Ah, sorry, forgot about this. Reverted and will wait for -docs or separate non-developer info subpackage. Ondrej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
