On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:28:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >>I'm considering system specs at this point, but establishing the roles > > >>deployed might aid in targeting more comprehensive documentation. > Beyond a > > >>basic desktop, what use cases would you like to see us represent? > > >Cloud guest, please. > > What kind of cloud? What kind of guest? > > I'm worried that this will turn into a very large and amorphous > > effort. > > Sure; let's start concrete -- Amazon EC2, starting at M1 Small. If we can > make it run nicely on Micro instances (and I don't see why not), so much > the > better. > > > > Trying to pin down 'typical Fedora use cases' seems rather like trying to > > box a cloud. > > Maybe we could at least try to describe the cloud a bit, though? That one > looks like a fluffy bunny.... > > -- > Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ < > mat...@fedoraproject.org> > > -- I'm not sure we need to get too specific - at least, we can't make specific claims unless someone can validate function, which I can't personally do for cloud guests - but it would be nice to claim function on a certain class of node. Once we clear the installer hurdle, a minimal system doesn't need much. Clearly, the memory requirements of the installation environment can't be equated to the memory requirements for the running environment, especially for cloud guests. @minimal requires less memory to install than a full desktop - but does anyone want to run Fedora with less memory than that, or is doing so venturing out of reasonable guidelines and into proof-of-concept adventureland? -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanetize at fedoraproject.org
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
