Am 19.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Richard Vickery: > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > >>>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > >>>> > >>>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually > say > >>>> that anywhere? > >>> > >>> but WHY are they not saying it clearly? > > > > Yes, they are saying it very clearly (see [1]) > > ok, so anything which refers to /bin and /sbin is a bug > after the UsrMove exactly as i felt > > wow, there are lot of bugs over the distribution > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout > In addition, Fedora packages MUST NOT place files or directories in the > /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64 directories. > Instead, the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories > must be used. Packages must assume that > /bin, /sbin, /lib, and /lib64 are symbolic links to the /usr/bin, > /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories, > respectively > > This might be unrelated, but the latest conversations, this on in particular, > make me wonder: Did I miss a > preupgrade, or is the above inquiry still focused around F18 bugs?
it is independent of F18/F19/Rawhide i had all sorts of troubles in my daily usage of F17/F18 resulting in the unfinsihed UsrMove and that one packager does not know what the other does because some does not care about changes in the distribution at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
