On Jan 25, 2013 3:45 PM, "Marcela Mašláňová" <mmasl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 01/25/2013 12:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 23:03 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> >>> It's best to rip the bandage of this in one release. >>> >>> The churn from this should have been more or less covered when we >>> implement biosdevname so the fallout from this change should be minimal >>> if any... >> >> >> I see the 's' word in there ;) >> >> That's always the hope, and then we meet the cold reality, where someone >> just patched 'em1' into everything and hoped that was good enough. But >> sure, 'damn the torpedoes' is a viable approach too. I guess I was just >> kind of hoping F19 would be a release without yet more churn in the core >> system where we could try and stabilize things a bit. >> > I agree. The scope says no impact, but who knows how many packages depend on hardcoded names. >
I guess we just have to cross that bridge when we get there... JBG
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
