On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Simo Sorce <s...@redhat.com> writes: > > > [...] B) I will *not* trust an update system that cuts me out of my > > remote server and make me *hope* it will come up later. If yum > > freaks out for *whatever* reason I want to be there with an > > emergency shell open [...] I've been saved more than once by a > > shell open during changes in the configuration or upgrades, that is > > non-negotiable to me. [...] > > I agree that this capability is very important.
Nobody has suggested removing it. It'll continue to work as well (or as badly, if you prefer) as it currently does. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
